Jon Voight: Obama, a false prophet.
“….everything that Obama has recommended has turned out to be disastrous.”
“….everything that Obama has recommended has turned out to be disastrous.”
In March 2000 the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) organization of Massachusetts held its 10 Year Anniversary GLSEN/Boston conference at Tufts University. This conference was fully supported by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Safe Schools Program, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and some of the presenters even received federal money. During the 2000 conference, workshop leaders led a “youth only, ages 14-21″ session that offered lessons in “fisting” a dangerous sexual practice. During another workshop an activist asked 14 year-old students, “Spit or swallow?… Is it rude?” The unbelievable audio clip is posted here. Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings is the founder of GLSEN. He was paid $273,573.96 as its executive director in 2007. Jennings was the keynote speaker at the 2000 GLSEN conference.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/08/obamas-percent-approval-lowest-president-point/
Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford and even Richard Nixon all had higher approval ratings 10-and-a-half months into their presidencies. Obama’s immediate predecessor, President George W. Bush, had an approval rating of 86 percent, or 39 points higher than Obama at this stage. Bush’s support came shortly after he launched the war in Afghanistan in response to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American … There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag … We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language … and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.” –Theodore Roosevelt 1907
This absolutely KICKS ASS!!!!
Check this out.
From: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99PJJQ05&show_article=1
The author of this article says “Honduras’ coup-installed leader has…”, but I say what coup-installed leader? The countries Supreme Court found the (former) Honduran President to be in violation of the law and the countries legislature voted to remove the President from power.
In the US, if the same would have happened to President Nixon, if he would not have resigned, the Congress would have passed articles of impeachment and the Senate would have ratified it and the President could walk out or be escorted out of office.
Would the world have called the new US President a “coup-installed leader” I think not.
This was a peaceful transfer of power, through the constitutional process of Honduras and should be held up as a gold standard for the region and for the world. The UN, EU and US should all be tripping over each other to offer assistance so the rest of the world can see, it is ok to stand up and remove a head of state that is operating against the countries constitution.
However, what is being taught now is, if your country’s head of state (President or other) is preparing to grab all of the power and kick the constitution to the curb you better not do anything but let them take over and be tyrannical. Much the way that Adolf Hitler became powerful, through changing the laws while most everyone stood by and watched, but did not say a word.
What a great time our world could have had between 1939 and 1945 if the Germans would have held to their own law and removed Adolf Hitler, instead of bending, changing and replacing the law for him to rule supremely.
The people, military, congress and courts of Honduras, you are all to be commended and lifted up as a shinning example for others, including the US to follow. Thank you.
With any plan, function, event or life, at it’s inception, the basic principle includes to “take that first step”. The first step of a rational, ethical and moral upheaval in these United Welfare States of America has begun.
Over the past 20 years, many books and movies have made headlines concerning the militia groups in America, spouting their rhetoric concerning the Constitution and inalienable rights as granted by the founding fathers. Many theories have evolved unto the nature of the future of militia groups in America. Many altercations have ensued due to troubles between the ATF, FBI, etc. vs. militia groups, the right to keep and bear arms and the FACT that the Amendments doesn’t note “automatic rifles” as being illegal.
Hate groups such as White Supremacists, Neo-Nazis, etc. have spouted their non-sense for years and that’s what made the headlines and that’s what moderate America has repelled. The platform by which these groups stand is based on hate and ignorance for sure.
Some militia groups, not all, but a few, are founded on the principles of our founding fathers – the minute men that answered our country’s call-to-arms at a moment’s notice to fight against the English Oppressors. Taxation without representation, etc. These militia groups you seldom hear from. They don’t get into any real trouble. They maintain themselves within the limits of Federal Law in order to stay out of trouble and continue with their normal lives.
While I don’t condone all of the actions of the Feds during some of the incidents, involving militia groups, I do agree that some action was needed. Was the action taken appropriate for the issue at hand? No chance. But some action needed to be taken. Perhaps to sit down and negotiate? Lord knows our government loves to negotiate with real enemies of the state. Unlike these “real enemies”, our fellow citizens that decide to have an 18″ sawed off shotgun instead of an 18 1/2″ sawed off shotgun are perceived enemies of the state because they have broken a Federal Law. While people in places such as China break International Law and good moral ethics when it comes to individual rights, including killing innocent babies as soon as the head breaches the birth canal, we decide to negotiate.
What may you ask is my point to this particular soap-box entry?
Why, State Rights of course!
Sarah Palin became the second governor in America to sign a State Legislative Resolution that points out the Federal Government, what rights the States allow the Federal Government to have. Contrary to popular beliefs, the Federal Government doesn’t control the States. The States are mandated by law to control the Federal Government.
I have been preaching for years that a second civil war is approaching. It is just over the horizon and I can feel it moving toward us. I see the next civil war being between the standing Federal Government and the individual States within the Union. I do not see all States participating, because, well frankly, some of the States are loaded with a bunch of pussies scared to death to do anything without the authority of their perceived Federal Masters.
For more info on this and other elements of the baby steps toward the next civil war, start by reading this.
/CF
From the Wall Street Journal Article:
“Article 239,” Mr. Estrada noted, “specifically states that any president who so much as proposes the permissibility of reelection ‘shall cease forthwith’ in his duties, and Article 4 provides that any ‘infraction’ of the succession rules constitutes treason.” Congress had little choice but to take its next step. It convened “immediately after Zelaya’s arrest,” Mr. Estrada wrote, “condemning his illegal conduct, and overwhelmingly voting (122-6) to remove him from office.”
By the laws enacted by a duly elected democratic congress, laws we previously had no problems with, laws that uphold proper democratic process, the Congress of Honduras acted with integrity by disallowing their President from breaking these laws in order to further his reign of power.
For those that don’t know, Honduras President Zelaya attempted to usurp the balance of power and increase his term by changing the laws of the land that disallow the office of President to hold more than two terms. These term limits, as imposed partially by our own government, allow for the democratic process to function correctly. These terms limits, as imposed, are to be STRICTLY ENFORCED per their constitution. It is a MANDATE, if anyone even attempts to change these guidelines, immediate removal from office shall occur.
This is a WONDERFUL thing. No one, especially the folks in power within these United Welfare States of America, should hold office for longer than 12 years. As it stands, Supreme Court Justices, Senators, among others, are allowed unlimited terms of office. Supreme Court Justices go one step further and circumvent the election process. Once in office, they stay in office until the day they die.
Terms Limits is a fundamental principle of a democratic society. No one person should stay in the same office indefinitely.
Hoorah! for Honduras and the Honduran Congress. Do not cow-tow to leftist ideals and allow Zelaya to return to office.
/CF