ordering pizza… a new perspective.
Check this out.
Check this out.
Meat. That’s the real problem with global warming.
What a fucking idiot.
Sure, methane is 23 times more potent as an ozone killer than carbon dioxide. But who has PROVEN that “green house gases” are causing the problem. Abso-fucking-lootley no-one. All of this “scientific evidence” as “they say”, has no basis. The data, as presented, isn’t showing overwhelming proof of anything. It’s just another way for the holly-libs to point the finger at corporate America in yet another attempt to bring the country to it’s knees.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6891362.ece
/CF
should not throw stones…
you know who you are, it doesn’t take a genius to figure it out. of course, there’s not many geniuses there to do the figuring.
/CF
What is great about America? Many things, particularly in this discussion, America allows you the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion. No matter if you’re Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Hindi or Satanic, we allow you the opportunity to express yourselves, within the boundaries of “non-violent” protest, by gathering, discussions, open-air-time on t.v. and radio, the printed press, etc. We give authorization through government permits to have cultural and religious gatherings on public property as long as you abide by the same set of rules, which is, to allow everyone the opportunity to view your message, without regard to their religious beliefs. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. There are no double standards.
We allow “Arab Days”, “Cinco De Mayo”, “Ramadan”, “Christmas”, “Chanukah”, “Kwanzaa”, etc. etc.
In fact, “allow” shouldn’t even be used because we accept these holidays without issue, without really thinking about it. It just “is”.
During these holidays, festivals, gatherings, etc. everyone is allowed the opportunity to express their beliefs in a manner befitting a rational and educated society that abides by a set of laws that protects the citizens from violence. You’re allowed to say your peace. However, if you’re in public and someone has a video camera, they’re allowed, by law to video tape everything they see. No matter if you’ve signed a waiver or not, no matter if they’re also recording audio. You’re in public, you have no “right to privacy” when you do something in the public eye.
What’s my point?
This is totally wrong! The police should have stepped in and taken control of this situation and protected the videographer’s rights to shoot their video without being harassed by these “security guards”. The only things these thugs were “securing” was the hidden agenda of the folks orchestrating this event.
/CF
From: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99PJJQ05&show_article=1
The author of this article says “Honduras’ coup-installed leader has…”, but I say what coup-installed leader? The countries Supreme Court found the (former) Honduran President to be in violation of the law and the countries legislature voted to remove the President from power.
In the US, if the same would have happened to President Nixon, if he would not have resigned, the Congress would have passed articles of impeachment and the Senate would have ratified it and the President could walk out or be escorted out of office.
Would the world have called the new US President a “coup-installed leader” I think not.
This was a peaceful transfer of power, through the constitutional process of Honduras and should be held up as a gold standard for the region and for the world. The UN, EU and US should all be tripping over each other to offer assistance so the rest of the world can see, it is ok to stand up and remove a head of state that is operating against the countries constitution.
However, what is being taught now is, if your country’s head of state (President or other) is preparing to grab all of the power and kick the constitution to the curb you better not do anything but let them take over and be tyrannical. Much the way that Adolf Hitler became powerful, through changing the laws while most everyone stood by and watched, but did not say a word.
What a great time our world could have had between 1939 and 1945 if the Germans would have held to their own law and removed Adolf Hitler, instead of bending, changing and replacing the law for him to rule supremely.
The people, military, congress and courts of Honduras, you are all to be commended and lifted up as a shinning example for others, including the US to follow. Thank you.
With any plan, function, event or life, at it’s inception, the basic principle includes to “take that first step”. The first step of a rational, ethical and moral upheaval in these United Welfare States of America has begun.
Over the past 20 years, many books and movies have made headlines concerning the militia groups in America, spouting their rhetoric concerning the Constitution and inalienable rights as granted by the founding fathers. Many theories have evolved unto the nature of the future of militia groups in America. Many altercations have ensued due to troubles between the ATF, FBI, etc. vs. militia groups, the right to keep and bear arms and the FACT that the Amendments doesn’t note “automatic rifles” as being illegal.
Hate groups such as White Supremacists, Neo-Nazis, etc. have spouted their non-sense for years and that’s what made the headlines and that’s what moderate America has repelled. The platform by which these groups stand is based on hate and ignorance for sure.
Some militia groups, not all, but a few, are founded on the principles of our founding fathers – the minute men that answered our country’s call-to-arms at a moment’s notice to fight against the English Oppressors. Taxation without representation, etc. These militia groups you seldom hear from. They don’t get into any real trouble. They maintain themselves within the limits of Federal Law in order to stay out of trouble and continue with their normal lives.
While I don’t condone all of the actions of the Feds during some of the incidents, involving militia groups, I do agree that some action was needed. Was the action taken appropriate for the issue at hand? No chance. But some action needed to be taken. Perhaps to sit down and negotiate? Lord knows our government loves to negotiate with real enemies of the state. Unlike these “real enemies”, our fellow citizens that decide to have an 18″ sawed off shotgun instead of an 18 1/2″ sawed off shotgun are perceived enemies of the state because they have broken a Federal Law. While people in places such as China break International Law and good moral ethics when it comes to individual rights, including killing innocent babies as soon as the head breaches the birth canal, we decide to negotiate.
What may you ask is my point to this particular soap-box entry?
Why, State Rights of course!
Sarah Palin became the second governor in America to sign a State Legislative Resolution that points out the Federal Government, what rights the States allow the Federal Government to have. Contrary to popular beliefs, the Federal Government doesn’t control the States. The States are mandated by law to control the Federal Government.
I have been preaching for years that a second civil war is approaching. It is just over the horizon and I can feel it moving toward us. I see the next civil war being between the standing Federal Government and the individual States within the Union. I do not see all States participating, because, well frankly, some of the States are loaded with a bunch of pussies scared to death to do anything without the authority of their perceived Federal Masters.
For more info on this and other elements of the baby steps toward the next civil war, start by reading this.
/CF
Why is it, when quoting from the Bible concerning the “flock” of the Church, the “Shepherd and his sheep” or other generalities involving a metaphor of “Sheep” and “People”, most don’t take this as an insult?
(1 Kings 22:17) Then Micaiah answered, “I saw all Israel scattered on the hills like sheep without a shepherd, and the LORD said, ‘These people have no master. Let each one go home in peace.'”
(Psalm 77:20) You led your people like a flock by the hand of Moses and Aaron.
(Psalm 78:52) But he brought his people out like a flock; he led them like sheep through the desert.
(Psalm 79:13) Then we your people, the sheep of your pasture, will praise you forever; from generation to generation we will recount your praise.
Moses, which I believe was a decent man, a spiritual man and a man decidedly against slavery, was depicted in the Bible as the person that led his flock to the land of Canaan and killed every man, woman, child and domesticated (perhaps other) animal in order to ensure the promised land to the Israelites. As I have said on many occasions, a just God, a merciful God, doesn’t wage war. Man wages war. Man has waged war on the principles he interprets as being “righteous and just”. Man has also led the masses, or “Sheep”, into believing and following a leader hell bent on causes not necessarily in the best interests of mankind as a whole.
Being “Sheep”, in the “Flock” or being led by the Shepherd, isn’t by any means, always a good thing.
(Psalm 44:22) Yet for your sake we face death all day long; we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.
One would think, the above passage came from an extremist Muslim’s interpretation of the Koran, not a direct quote from the Christo-Judeo Bible. Yet, here we are, in the midst of a religeous war in the Middle East, believing that extremist Muslims are the only aggressors. From that passage alone could bring forth a multitude of Judeo-Christians with extreme beliefs justifying their course of violence in an ongoing Holy War. This Holy War is without borders. Violence begets Violence. Turn the other cheek is one part of the Bible soon forgotten.
/CF
From the Wall Street Journal Article:
“Article 239,” Mr. Estrada noted, “specifically states that any president who so much as proposes the permissibility of reelection ‘shall cease forthwith’ in his duties, and Article 4 provides that any ‘infraction’ of the succession rules constitutes treason.” Congress had little choice but to take its next step. It convened “immediately after Zelaya’s arrest,” Mr. Estrada wrote, “condemning his illegal conduct, and overwhelmingly voting (122-6) to remove him from office.”
By the laws enacted by a duly elected democratic congress, laws we previously had no problems with, laws that uphold proper democratic process, the Congress of Honduras acted with integrity by disallowing their President from breaking these laws in order to further his reign of power.
For those that don’t know, Honduras President Zelaya attempted to usurp the balance of power and increase his term by changing the laws of the land that disallow the office of President to hold more than two terms. These term limits, as imposed partially by our own government, allow for the democratic process to function correctly. These terms limits, as imposed, are to be STRICTLY ENFORCED per their constitution. It is a MANDATE, if anyone even attempts to change these guidelines, immediate removal from office shall occur.
This is a WONDERFUL thing. No one, especially the folks in power within these United Welfare States of America, should hold office for longer than 12 years. As it stands, Supreme Court Justices, Senators, among others, are allowed unlimited terms of office. Supreme Court Justices go one step further and circumvent the election process. Once in office, they stay in office until the day they die.
Terms Limits is a fundamental principle of a democratic society. No one person should stay in the same office indefinitely.
Hoorah! for Honduras and the Honduran Congress. Do not cow-tow to leftist ideals and allow Zelaya to return to office.
/CF